[perf] resolve: Introduce separate (Local,Extern)ModuleData structures for local and external modules respectively

[petrochenkov]

The first commit from #156362 for benchmarking.

[rustbot]

r? @wesleywiser

rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

• Owners of files modified in this PR: compiler
• compiler expanded to 73 candidates
• Random selection from 17 candidates

[petrochenkov]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: b521230 (b521230346dfcc7ccbd74abfdc87907a827e413e, parent: 99eed207b47aca1fec5c665531db8e948a92d0ca)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (b521230): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - please read:

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, fix the regressions and do another perf run. Neutral or positive results will clear the label automatically.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.1%, 0.5%]	44
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.2%	[0.1%, 0.4%]	13
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.2%, -0.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[-0.2%, 0.5%]	46

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.0%, secondary -1.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.2%	[0.8%, 1.7%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.5%	[-2.5%, -2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.7%	[-2.8%, -0.4%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-2.5%, 1.7%]	3

Cycles

Results (primary 2.6%, secondary -2.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.6%	[2.6%, 2.6%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.9%	[2.9%, 2.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-5.2%	[-7.8%, -2.7%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.6%	[2.6%, 2.6%]	1

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 499.454s -> 498.007s (-0.29%)
Artifact size: 397.23 MiB -> 397.19 MiB (-0.01%)