NO-JIRA: Make build-args files use 5.0 version and revert repo names change by dustymabe · Pull Request #1936 · openshift/os

dustymabe · 2026-05-14T20:44:55Z

commit b39cb0c
Author: Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com
Date: Thu May 14 16:18:56 2026 -0400

switch back to Major.Minor repo names

This is largely a revert of d0be268. Changing the repo names doesn't
work for us because our coreos/redhat-coreos internal repo with all
the repos for various versions of things name them with the version
in the repo name. i.e.  rhel-9.8-appstream

If this is still a problem where CI has out of date content in the
rhel98 repo we should work with ART to get it updated.

commit 8c406fb
Author: Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com
Date: Thu May 14 11:26:29 2026 -0400

move the OKD SIG repo to 5.0

The repo exists now.

commit 23cca9e
Author: Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com
Date: Thu May 14 11:22:11 2026 -0400

Make build-args files use 5.0 version

This didn't get updated in [1], but [2], which created
these files, was also in flight at the same time.

[1] https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/1930
[2] https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/1919

This didn't get updated in [1], but [2], which created these files, was also in flight at the same time. [1] openshift#1930 [2] openshift#1919

The repo exists now.

This is largely a revert of d0be268. Changing the repo names doesn't work for us because our coreos/redhat-coreos internal repo with all the repos for various versions of things name them with the version in the repo name. i.e. rhel-9.8-appstream If this is still a problem where CI has out of date content in the rhel98 repo we should work with ART to get it updated.

dustymabe · 2026-05-14T22:31:07Z

/retest

dustymabe · 2026-05-16T03:18:17Z

/retest

dustymabe · 2026-05-16T22:15:59Z

/retest

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-05-16T22:16:14Z

@dustymabe: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

commit b39cb0c
Author: Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com
Date: Thu May 14 16:18:56 2026 -0400

switch back to Major.Minor repo names

This is largely a revert of d0be268. Changing the repo names doesn't
work for us because our coreos/redhat-coreos internal repo with all
the repos for various versions of things name them with the version
in the repo name. i.e. rhel-9.8-appstream

If this is still a problem where CI has out of date content in the
rhel98 repo we should work with ART to get it updated.

commit 8c406fb
Author: Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com
Date: Thu May 14 11:26:29 2026 -0400

move the OKD SIG repo to 5.0

The repo exists now.

commit 23cca9e
Author: Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com
Date: Thu May 14 11:22:11 2026 -0400

Make build-args files use 5.0 version

This didn't get updated in [1], but [2], which created
these files, was also in flight at the same time.

[1] #1930
[2] #1919

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

dustymabe · 2026-05-18T14:18:29Z

/retest

dustymabe · 2026-05-18T17:19:30Z

/retest

redhat-chai-bot · 2026-05-19T15:32:39Z

/retest

Triggering re-run now that https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/79475|openshift/release#79475 (ocp-5.0-rhel98.repo → CDN for 9.8 GA) has merged (14:35 UTC) and the in-cluster base-5-0-rhel98.ocp.svc.cluster.local config has had time to roll out.

(Automated retest requested from the forum-ocp-art thread.)

hoxhaeris · 2026-05-19T17:20:42Z

/retest

krb5-1.21.1-9.el9_8 subpackages are now present in the rhel-9.8-baseos repo on rhsm-pulp (errata 165401 has shipped). The depsolve conflict between the @System rhel-coreos-base layer and the CDN repos should now be resolved.

Packages confirmed at https://rhsm-pulp.corp.redhat.com/content/eus/rhel9/9.8/x86_64/baseos/os/Packages/k/ as of 2026-05-19 17:20 UTC:

krb5-libs-1.21.1-9.el9_8.x86_64.rpm
krb5-pkinit-1.21.1-9.el9_8.x86_64.rpm
krb5-server-1.21.1-9.el9_8.x86_64.rpm
krb5-server-ldap-1.21.1-9.el9_8.x86_64.rpm
krb5-workstation-1.21.1-9.el9_8.x86_64.rpm

Retesting to see if the rpm-ostree depsolve now passes.

cc @U9D8C9CG3 (via Chai Bot follow-up from https://redhat-internal.enterprise.slack.com/archives/CB95J6R4N/p1778846979924059)

redhat-chai-bot · 2026-05-19T17:23:10Z

/retest

krb5-1.21.1-9.el9_8 (libs, workstation, pkinit, server, server-ldap) is now present in the rhel-9.8 baseos pulp repo (https://rhsm-pulp.corp.redhat.com/content/eus/rhel9/9.8/x86_64/baseos/os/Packages/k/) — errata 165401 has shipped. Retesting to confirm the rpm-ostree depsolve conflict from the previous run is resolved.

cc @jlebon

dustymabe · 2026-05-19T19:00:05Z

/retest

aaradhak

/lgtm

marmijo

/lgtm

yasminvalim

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2026-05-19T19:07:17Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aaradhak, dustymabe, marmijo, yasminvalim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [aaradhak,dustymabe,marmijo,yasminvalim]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci · 2026-05-19T19:13:34Z

@dustymabe: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

dustymabe · 2026-05-19T19:41:05Z

/verified by CI

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-05-19T19:41:19Z

@dustymabe: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

dustymabe added 3 commits May 14, 2026 11:26

Make build-args files use 5.0 version

23cca9e

This didn't get updated in [1], but [2], which created these files, was also in flight at the same time. [1] openshift#1930 [2] openshift#1919

move the OKD SIG repo to 5.0

8c406fb

The repo exists now.

openshift-ci Bot requested review from prestist and tlbueno May 14, 2026 20:45

openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 14, 2026

dustymabe mentioned this pull request May 15, 2026

ART-14453: Use rpm-ostree install directly in legacy build pipeline #1935

Open

dustymabe changed the title ~~Make build-args files use 5.0 version and revert repo names change~~ NO-JIRA: Make build-args files use 5.0 version and revert repo names change May 16, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 16, 2026

redhat-chai-bot mentioned this pull request May 18, 2026

Fix mirror2 auth in ocp-5.0-rhel102.repo (follow-up to #79351) openshift/release#79429

Merged

aaradhak approved these changes May 19, 2026

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot assigned aaradhak May 19, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 19, 2026

marmijo approved these changes May 19, 2026

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot assigned marmijo May 19, 2026

yasminvalim approved these changes May 19, 2026

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot assigned yasminvalim May 19, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label May 19, 2026

openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 439f6e9 into openshift:master May 19, 2026
3 checks passed

travier mentioned this pull request May 21, 2026

[release-4.22] COS-4051: tree: add labels.json and security OCI labels for Clair scanning #1933

Open

Conversation

dustymabe commented May 14, 2026

Uh oh!

dustymabe commented May 14, 2026

Uh oh!

dustymabe commented May 16, 2026

Uh oh!

dustymabe commented May 16, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 16, 2026

Uh oh!

dustymabe commented May 18, 2026

Uh oh!

dustymabe commented May 18, 2026

Uh oh!

redhat-chai-bot commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

hoxhaeris commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

redhat-chai-bot commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

dustymabe commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

aaradhak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

marmijo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

yasminvalim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

dustymabe commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants