Skip to content

Minfraud alert IPv6 range is added to alerts document#1613

Closed
apathor wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
mike/minfraud-ip1
Closed

Minfraud alert IPv6 range is added to alerts document#1613
apathor wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
mike/minfraud-ip1

Conversation

@apathor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@apathor apathor commented Mar 18, 2026

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily updates the Minfraud alerts documentation to include a newly recognized IPv6 range, ensuring the documentation reflects the latest network configurations. Additionally, it includes an update to the mise.lock file, which reorganizes tool platform definitions and expands support for specific Linux environments.

Highlights

  • Minfraud Alerts Documentation: Added a new IPv6 range to the list of Minfraud alert IP addresses.
  • Code Formatting: Applied minor indentation changes to a Go code example within the alerts documentation.
  • Tool Configuration Update: The mise.lock file was updated, reformatting tool platform configurations and adding new Linux MUSL targets for the pnpm tool.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying dev-site with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 098ccff
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://42358361.dev-site-4ua.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://mike-minfraud-ip1.dev-site-4ua.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request updates the content/minfraud/alerts.md file by adding a new IPv6 address to a list and adjusting the indentation of Go import statements within a code block. Additionally, the auto-generated mise.lock file was updated, introducing a new header comment, reformatting platform-specific tool configurations to a block-table style, and adding support for musl variants of Linux platforms for the pnpm tool.

@horgh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

horgh commented Mar 30, 2026

@apathor should we merge this?

@dhogan8
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dhogan8 commented Apr 21, 2026

@apathor same question above, should we merge this? If so we'll need to address merge conflicts.

@oschwald
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems like @kdarndt made the relevant changes in 652e931. I'll close this.

@oschwald oschwald closed this Apr 21, 2026
@oschwald oschwald deleted the mike/minfraud-ip1 branch April 21, 2026 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants