Minfraud alert IPv6 range is added to alerts document#1613
Minfraud alert IPv6 range is added to alerts document#1613
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request primarily updates the Minfraud alerts documentation to include a newly recognized IPv6 range, ensuring the documentation reflects the latest network configurations. Additionally, it includes an update to the mise.lock file, which reorganizes tool platform definitions and expands support for specific Linux environments. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
Deploying dev-site with
|
| Latest commit: |
098ccff
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://42358361.dev-site-4ua.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://mike-minfraud-ip1.dev-site-4ua.pages.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request updates the content/minfraud/alerts.md file by adding a new IPv6 address to a list and adjusting the indentation of Go import statements within a code block. Additionally, the auto-generated mise.lock file was updated, introducing a new header comment, reformatting platform-specific tool configurations to a block-table style, and adding support for musl variants of Linux platforms for the pnpm tool.
|
@apathor should we merge this? |
|
@apathor same question above, should we merge this? If so we'll need to address merge conflicts. |
No description provided.