Skip to content

chore: re-enable LLVM CI#13700

Draft
hargoniX wants to merge 24 commits into
masterfrom
hbv/revive_llvm
Draft

chore: re-enable LLVM CI#13700
hargoniX wants to merge 24 commits into
masterfrom
hbv/revive_llvm

Conversation

@hargoniX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label May 11, 2026
@mathlib-lean-pr-testing
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mathlib-lean-pr-testing Bot commented May 11, 2026

Mathlib CI status (docs):

  • ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-mathlib branch. Try git rebase 2229b077d6ebd2ff42d665fe1c32501df8915dff --onto a71f158f7bd96ff9ea846f7ff4cc658de3c8b0f9. You can force Mathlib CI using the force-mathlib-ci label. (2026-05-11 09:59:28)
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-11 20:52:47) View Log
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-11 23:12:40) View Log
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-12 23:57:12) View Log
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-13 14:48:52) View Log
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-13 23:16:10) View Log
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-14 00:14:35) View Log
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-14 01:15:18) View Log

@leanprover-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

leanprover-bot commented May 11, 2026

Reference manual CI status:

  • ❗ Reference manual CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-manual branch. Try git rebase 2229b077d6ebd2ff42d665fe1c32501df8915dff --onto a71f158f7bd96ff9ea846f7ff4cc658de3c8b0f9. You can force reference manual CI using the force-manual-ci label. (2026-05-11 09:59:29)
  • ❗ Reference manual CI can not be attempted yet, as the nightly-testing-2026-05-11 tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto nightly-with-manual, reference manual CI should run now. You can force reference manual CI using the force-manual-ci label. (2026-05-11 19:57:40)
  • ✅ Reference manual branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-12 23:09:44) View Log
  • 🟡 Reference manual branch lean-pr-testing-13700 build against this PR didn't complete normally. (2026-05-12 23:11:36) View Log
  • ✅ Reference manual branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-13 13:58:12) View Log
  • 🟡 Reference manual branch lean-pr-testing-13700 build against this PR didn't complete normally. (2026-05-13 13:59:20) View Log
  • ✅ Reference manual branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-13 22:29:20) View Log
  • 🟡 Reference manual branch lean-pr-testing-13700 build against this PR didn't complete normally. (2026-05-13 22:30:51) View Log
  • ✅ Reference manual branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-13 23:27:53) View Log
  • 🟡 Reference manual branch lean-pr-testing-13700 build against this PR didn't complete normally. (2026-05-13 23:29:33) View Log
  • ✅ Reference manual branch lean-pr-testing-13700 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-05-14 00:23:08) View Log
  • 🟡 Reference manual branch lean-pr-testing-13700 build against this PR didn't complete normally. (2026-05-14 00:23:31) View Log

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the mathlib4-nightly-available A branch for this PR exists at leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing:lean-pr-testing-NNNN label May 11, 2026
@mathlib-lean-pr-testing mathlib-lean-pr-testing Bot added the builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR label May 11, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the changes-stage0 Contains stage0 changes, merge manually using rebase label May 11, 2026
mathlib-nightly-testing Bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request May 11, 2026
mathlib-nightly-testing Bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing that referenced this pull request May 11, 2026
@hargoniX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!bench

@leanprover-radar
Copy link
Copy Markdown

leanprover-radar commented May 12, 2026

Benchmark results for 5d63f74 against 2229b07 are in. There are significant results. @hargoniX

  • 🟥 build exited with code 1
  • 🟥 other exited with code 1

No significant changes detected.

@hargoniX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!bench

@leanprover-radar
Copy link
Copy Markdown

leanprover-radar commented May 13, 2026

Benchmark results for c5f8dc8 against 2229b07 are in. There are significant results. @hargoniX

  • 🟥 build exited with code 1

Large changes (7✅, 10🟥)

  • 🟥 compiled/ilean_roundtrip//instructions: +138.7M (+0.59%)
  • compiled/nat_repr//instructions: -548.5M (-1.39%)
  • 🟥 compiled/phashmap//instructions: +71.7M (+0.81%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/build clean//instructions: +213.2G (+13.71%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/build clean//wall-clock: +2s (+7.80%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/config elab//instructions: +69.8M (+2.89%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/config import//instructions: +70.6M (+5.82%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/config tree//instructions: +70.2M (+5.63%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/env//instructions: +72.1M (+5.84%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/startup//instructions: +66.7M (+34.75%)
  • 🟥 misc/import Lean//instructions: +72.0M (+4.82%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//task-clock: -21s (-24.29%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//wall-clock: -4s (-17.41%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//instructions: -318.1G (-65.14%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//task-clock: -40s (-64.10%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//wall-clock: -15s (-69.21%)
  • size/compile/.out//bytes: -23MiB (-1.16%)

Medium changes (3✅, 18🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

Small changes (4✅, 20🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

@hargoniX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!bench

@leanprover-radar
Copy link
Copy Markdown

leanprover-radar commented May 13, 2026

Benchmark results for d129997 against 2229b07 are in. There are significant results. @hargoniX

  • 🟥 build exited with code 1

Large changes (7✅, 11🟥)

  • 🟥 compiled/ilean_roundtrip//instructions: +137.9M (+0.59%)
  • compiled/nat_repr//instructions: -548.5M (-1.39%)
  • 🟥 compiled/phashmap//instructions: +71.0M (+0.80%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/build clean//instructions: +214.9G (+13.82%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/build clean//task-clock: +44s (+8.69%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/build clean//wall-clock: +2s (+8.04%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/config elab//instructions: +69.0M (+2.86%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/config import//instructions: +70.8M (+5.84%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/config tree//instructions: +70.7M (+5.68%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/env//instructions: +71.3M (+5.77%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/startup//instructions: +66.9M (+34.89%)
  • 🟥 misc/import Lean//instructions: +72.2M (+4.84%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//task-clock: -21s (-23.96%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//wall-clock: -4s (-16.39%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//instructions: -317.0G (-64.93%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//task-clock: -40s (-63.40%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//wall-clock: -15s (-68.75%)
  • size/compile/.out//bytes: -23MiB (-1.16%)

Medium changes (3✅, 17🟥)

  • 🟥 compiled/server_startup//instructions: +39.6M (+10.93%)
  • compiled/watchdogRss//instructions: -182.9M (-0.72%)
  • 🟥 elab/big_beq_rec//instructions: +143.6M (+0.88%)
  • 🟥 elab/big_deceq//instructions: +74.2M (+1.66%)
  • 🟥 elab/big_deceq_rec//instructions: +76.1M (+1.28%)
  • elab/big_do//instructions: -80.7M (-0.37%)
  • 🟥 elab/big_match//instructions: +66.2M (+0.61%)
  • 🟥 elab/big_match_nat//instructions: +73.9M (+1.47%)
  • 🟥 elab/big_struct//instructions: +63.7M (+2.46%)
  • 🟥 elab/big_struct_dep1//instructions: +66.7M (+1.24%)
  • 🟥 elab/cbv_dedup//instructions: +67.3M (+2.01%)
  • 🟥 elab/delayed_assign//instructions: +75.8M (+2.10%)
  • 🟥 elab/delayed_sharing//instructions: +77.0M (+2.62%)
  • 🟥 elab/grind_ring_5//instructions: +60.8M (+0.71%)
  • 🟥 elab/iterators//instructions: +63.6M (+2.40%)
  • 🟥 elab/omega_stress//instructions: +66.8M (+1.68%)
  • 🟥 elab/simp_arith1//instructions: +65.7M (+2.85%)
  • 🟥 elab/string_simp_ne//instructions: +75.9M (+1.29%)
  • 🟥 interpreted/iterators//instructions: +64.5M (+0.18%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//instructions: -150.0G (-20.66%)

Small changes (4✅, 21🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

@hargoniX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!bench

@leanprover-radar
Copy link
Copy Markdown

leanprover-radar commented May 13, 2026

Benchmark results for 6578b52 against 2229b07 are in. There are significant results. @hargoniX

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +7.0T (+61.08%)

Large changes (8✅, 15🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

Medium changes (3✅, 19🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

Small changes (4✅, 24🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

mathlib-nightly-testing Bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
mathlib-nightly-testing Bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
leanprover-bot added a commit to leanprover/reference-manual that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
@hargoniX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!bench

@leanprover-radar
Copy link
Copy Markdown

leanprover-radar commented May 13, 2026

Benchmark results for 7f7d684 against 2229b07 are in. There are significant results. @hargoniX

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +6.8T (+58.99%)

Large changes (8✅, 14🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

Medium changes (3✅, 18🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

Small changes (5✅, 19🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

@hargoniX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mathlib-nightly-testing Bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
mathlib-nightly-testing Bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
leanprover-bot added a commit to leanprover/reference-manual that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
@hargoniX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!bench

@leanprover-radar
Copy link
Copy Markdown

leanprover-radar commented May 13, 2026

Benchmark results for 75f6e01 against 2229b07 are in. There are significant results. @hargoniX

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +6.5T (+56.90%)

Large changes (9✅, 6🟥)

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +6.5T (+56.90%)
  • 🟥 build//task-clock: +21m 3s (+61.93%)
  • 🟥 build//wall-clock: +48s (+31.31%)
  • 🟥 compiled/ilean_roundtrip//instructions: +138.6M (+0.59%)
  • compiled/nat_repr//instructions: -548.3M (-1.39%)
  • 🟥 compiled/phashmap//instructions: +71.1M (+0.80%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/build clean//instructions: +138.8G (+8.93%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//task-clock: -22s (-25.00%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//wall-clock: -5s (-18.18%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//instructions: -318.1G (-65.14%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//task-clock: -40s (-64.10%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//wall-clock: -15s (-69.48%)
  • size/compile/.out//bytes: -107MiB (-5.41%)
  • size/install//bytes: -39MiB (-1.32%)
  • size/libleanshared.so//bytes: -14MiB (-9.67%)

and 1 hidden

Medium changes (3✅, 8🟥)

  • 🟥 compiled/parser//task-clock: +239ms (+11.32%)
  • 🟥 compiled/parser//wall-clock: +239ms (+11.31%)
  • compiled/watchdogRss//instructions: -206.4M (-0.81%)
  • elab/big_do//instructions: -126.6M (-0.57%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/build clean//wall-clock: +1s (+5.35%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/config import//instructions: +22.1M (+1.83%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/config tree//instructions: +21.8M (+1.75%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/startup//instructions: +17.7M (+9.25%)
  • 🟥 misc/import Lean//instructions: +26.3M (+1.76%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//instructions: -155.1G (-21.37%)
  • 🟥 size/all/.cpp//lines: +136.0 (+0.47%)

Small changes (6✅, 27🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

@hargoniX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mathlib-nightly-testing Bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
mathlib-nightly-testing Bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
leanprover-bot added a commit to leanprover/reference-manual that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
@hargoniX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!bench

@leanprover-radar
Copy link
Copy Markdown

leanprover-radar commented May 13, 2026

Benchmark results for 393056a against 2229b07 are in. There are significant results. @hargoniX

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +6.5T (+56.98%)

Large changes (9✅, 6🟥)

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +6.5T (+56.98%)
  • 🟥 build//task-clock: +21m 6s (+62.05%)
  • 🟥 build//wall-clock: +48s (+31.46%)
  • 🟥 compiled/ilean_roundtrip//instructions: +139.0M (+0.59%)
  • compiled/nat_repr//instructions: -548.4M (-1.39%)
  • 🟥 compiled/phashmap//instructions: +71.1M (+0.80%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/build clean//instructions: +139.4G (+8.97%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//task-clock: -22s (-24.82%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//wall-clock: -4s (-17.76%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//instructions: -317.1G (-64.94%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//task-clock: -40s (-64.06%)
  • misc/re-elab watchdog Init.Data.List.Sublist//wall-clock: -15s (-69.24%)
  • size/compile/.out//bytes: -107MiB (-5.41%)
  • size/install//bytes: -39MiB (-1.32%)
  • size/libleanshared.so//bytes: -14MiB (-9.67%)

and 1 hidden

Medium changes (3✅, 7🟥)

  • compiled/watchdogRss//instructions: -204.8M (-0.80%)
  • elab/big_do//instructions: -124.7M (-0.56%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/build clean//wall-clock: +1s (+5.54%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/config import//instructions: +21.7M (+1.79%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/config tree//instructions: +21.1M (+1.70%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/env//instructions: +22.5M (+1.82%)
  • 🟥 lake/inundation/startup//instructions: +18.1M (+9.44%)
  • 🟥 misc/import Lean//instructions: +25.4M (+1.70%)
  • misc/re-elab Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas//instructions: -152.8G (-21.04%)
  • 🟥 size/all/.cpp//lines: +147.0 (+0.51%)

Small changes (5✅, 23🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

mathlib-nightly-testing Bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request May 14, 2026
mathlib-nightly-testing Bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing that referenced this pull request May 14, 2026
leanprover-bot added a commit to leanprover/reference-manual that referenced this pull request May 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

builds-manual CI has verified that the Lean Language Reference builds against this PR builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR changes-stage0 Contains stage0 changes, merge manually using rebase mathlib4-nightly-available A branch for this PR exists at leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing:lean-pr-testing-NNNN toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants