chore(docs): changes to url

[tac0turtle]

Overview

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@tac0turtle has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 1 minutes and 8 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 06b107ff-56f2-45fb-98fe-dbd098404ed4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9e08e8 and 2fd4506.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)

• .github/workflows/docs_deploy.yml
• README.md
• apps/grpc/README.md
• docs/.vitepress/config.ts
• docs/concepts/block-lifecycle.md
• docs/guides/evm/reth-backup.md
• docs/learn/specs/block-manager.md
• docs/public/install-go.sh
• docs/public/install.sh
• docs/reference/specs/block-manager.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch marko/docs-ev-xyz-rename

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[claude]

Claude finished @tac0turtle's task in 58s —— View job

---

Code Review

This PR renames documentation URLs from ev.xyz to docs.ev.xyz across 10 files. The changes are straightforward and consistent — good scope.

Summary

The PR correctly updates:

• CI deployment CNAME (docs_deploy.yml)
• Sitemap hostname and Plausible analytics domain in config.ts
• All documentation cross-links in markdown files
• Installation scripts that curl from the docs domain

---

Issues Found

Missed references in docs/.vitepress/config.ts (lines 66–67)

Two Twitter Card meta tags still reference the old domain:

["meta", { name: "twitter:site:domain", content: "ev.xyz" }],      // line 66 — should be docs.ev.xyz
["meta", { name: "twitter:url", content: "https://ev.xyz" }],       // line 67 — should be https://docs.ev.xyz

These control the domain attribution in Twitter/X link previews. Since the docs are moving to docs.ev.xyz, these should be updated to match. Fix this →

---

Other References — Intentionally Unchanged (OK)

• tools/blob-decoder/README.md:38 — ev.xyz appears in ASCII art as a brand attribution (║ by ev.xyz ║), not a navigable link. Likely fine as-is.
• client/crates/client/README.md:73,80,83 — Uses secure-node.ev.xyz, a different subdomain for a gRPC endpoint example, not the docs site. Not in scope for this rename.

---

Overall Assessment

The PR is clean and the change is mechanical. The only actionable issue is the two Twitter meta tags in config.ts. All other changes look correct.

[github-actions]

The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow CI / buf-check (pull_request).

Build	Format	Lint	Breaking	Updated (UTC)
✅ passed	⏩ skipped	✅ passed	✅ passed	Apr 13, 2026, 10:16 AM

[github-actions]

PR Preview Action v1.8.1
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2026-04-13 10:51 UTC

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.79%. Comparing base (a9e08e8) to head (2fd4506).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3242      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.81%   61.79%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         120      120              
  Lines       12670    12670              
==========================================
- Hits         7832     7830       -2     
- Misses       3961     3962       +1     
- Partials      877      878       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
combined	61.79% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.