Skip to content

docs: remove Beta label from base_transactionStatus in FAQ table#1266

Open
Kubudak90 wants to merge 1 commit intobase:masterfrom
Kubudak90:fix-beta-label-faq
Open

docs: remove Beta label from base_transactionStatus in FAQ table#1266
Kubudak90 wants to merge 1 commit intobase:masterfrom
Kubudak90:fix-beta-label-faq

Conversation

@Kubudak90
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Removes the outdated (Beta) label from the base_transactionStatus entry in the Flashblocks FAQ table.

Changes

  • Updated the RPC methods table in faq.mdx
  • Changed base_transactionStatus | Check if transaction is in mempool (Beta) to base_transactionStatus | Check if transaction is in mempool

Rationale

The base_transactionStatus endpoint documentation in base_transactionStatus.mdx does not indicate Beta status, suggesting the endpoint has been stabilized. This change ensures consistency across the documentation.

Checklist

  • Verified the endpoint documentation does not have Beta status
  • Updated the FAQ table to match
  • No other Beta labels found for this endpoint

The base_transactionStatus endpoint is no longer in Beta, as evidenced
by its stable documentation in the API reference. This commit removes
the outdated (Beta) label from the RPC methods table in the FAQ to
maintain consistency across the documentation.
@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/2
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 1
Sum 2

@Cloakie47
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Looks good! This is consistent with the endpoint documentation which doesn't indicate Beta status. Happy to see this cleaned up

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants