Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
cc @Nemtecl Could you help review it? before releasing version 0.9.0. |
Nemtecl
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2026
Contributor
Nemtecl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM ! Let's try this and happy to help on iterating if needed
Member
Author
|
thanks @Nemtecl , 0.9.0 is released |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Complete the remaining schema v0.11.2 follow-ups:
selectandbooleanvariants forsession/set_config_optionmessage_idinClientSideConnection.prompt()params-style compatibility for the new config option request shapesRelated issues
Relates to #80
Testing
make checkmake testDocs & screenshots
No docs or example updates needed.
Checklist
feat:,fix:).make gen-all) are called out if applicable.No schema regeneration needed.