-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
Adds dummy err_data to residual data for slicers to work #3931
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jellybean2004
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
patch_residual_slicer
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't
numpy.zerosmake more sense?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In
manipulations.py, a zero value inerr-datatriggers a fallback, anddatais used as a proxy. So I used ones.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
χ² = Σ (f(x) - y)²/Δy² so Δy=1 is a natural value to use in the absence of any information about the data uncertainty. Parameter uncertainties can be normalized by √(χ²/DOF) to account for improperly scaled error bars. I'm not doing this by default because this assumes that there is no systematic error.
Note: in the broader stats world where measurement uncertainty is unknown, data is generally drawn without uncertainty. Whether the result of SasView (i.e., the plotting infrastructure and the bumps interface) can handle the missing error bars is a separate question. They probably should, since fixed Δy = 1 will make for ugly plots.
What does sasdata do with datasets that don't have any associated uncertainty? Does it return them as None? In which case, the correct fix is to leave err_data as None and fix the "isfinite" masking.
Note 2: If this is acting on a normalized residual, then the Δy is supposed to be one. It should be put there by whatever generated the residual, though, and not be introduced by the slicer.