moxa iologik: Avoid covering displayed values with disconnection errrors in OPI#961
moxa iologik: Avoid covering displayed values with disconnection errrors in OPI#961FreddieAkeroyd wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
|
Looking at the original PRs, this functionality (hiding unaliased PVs) was explicitly included. I guess it was so that people didn't see lots of irrelevant/confusing inputs in the OPI if they were only using one or two of them. I'm not convinced we want this change? If we do want this change, we need:
|
|
What i was trying to avoiding was the rather horrible mess of disconnected boxes that seemed to get left when aliases were not added, i think the |
That sounds reasonable to me. |
|
The greying out would need an OPI change, the other probably not. At this stage should we just make the PVs available but hidden, which gets round one problem where the disconnected errors actually blocked out what you had tried to make visible by aliases |
3c30f16 to
ba86862
Compare
ba86862 to
e23a5cc
Compare
Description of work
show unaliased values
To test
check all values show in OPI
Acceptance criteria
List the acceptance criteria for the PR
galil-oldbranch based) and new (masterbranch based) drivers? If so have all appropriate PRs been created **Code Review
Functional Tests
..._0nwheren>1) run correctlymacLib: macroto find instances ofmacLib: macro [macro name] is undefined...Final steps