Skip to content

docs: update billing usage terminology#1103

Draft
TheFactoriousDROID wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/factory-standard-credits-wording
Draft

docs: update billing usage terminology#1103
TheFactoriousDROID wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/factory-standard-credits-wording

Conversation

@TheFactoriousDROID
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TheFactoriousDROID TheFactoriousDROID commented May 9, 2026

Diff stats

File + - Rationale
docs/pricing.mdx 23 23 Replace billing terminology with Rate Limits for plan caps, Usage Limits for configurable cost controls, and Factory Standard Credits for billing units.
docs/reference/analytics-api.mdx 11 11 Describe credit consumption while preserving existing /tokens and billable_tokens API identifiers.
docs/reference/cli-reference.mdx 1 1 Make /cost description unit-neutral.
docs/guides/power-user/token-efficiency.mdx 1 1 Avoid implying /cost only reports raw token usage.
docs/changelog/release-notes.mdx 19 19 Align historical billing, limit, multiplier, and preserved-token wording with current terminology.

What

Standardize billing terminology

  • Uses Factory Standard Credits where the copy refers to the billing unit formerly surfaced as Billable Tokens.
  • Uses Rate Limits where the copy refers to Factory-imposed plan/product caps, fallback behavior, Droid Core pools, provider throttling, or rate-limit notifications.
  • Uses Usage Limits where the copy refers to self-imposed cost controls that prevent credit spend from moving too fast, including global/user/admin-configured limits.
  • Uses broader usage or consumption where the copy is discussing spend/activity in general and does not need to name the unit.
  • Uses Model Multiplier / Multiplier for model pricing multipliers rather than token multipliers.

Preserve valid token wording

This PR intentionally preserves token when it refers to non-billing concepts:

  • Raw LLM/model accounting: input tokens, output tokens, cache read/write tokens, thinking tokens, context token limits, and token usage breakdowns such as Mission Control worker-level raw usage.
  • Public API/schema identifiers: /tokens, billable_tokens, input_tokens, and output_tokens remain unchanged because they are existing contract names. The prose now explains billable_tokens as Factory Standard Credits consumed.
  • Auth and security: API tokens, OAuth tokens, bearer tokens, GitHub tokens, SCIM tokens, and secret-scanning examples remain unchanged.
  • Intentional rename history: release notes now say Billable Tokens renamed to Factory Standard Credits because that entry is documenting the rename itself.
  • Unrelated product language: design tokens and benchmark token usage remain unchanged where applicable.

Keep this PR focused

  • Drops Japanese docs changes for this pass so reviewers can evaluate the English public-facing terminology clearly.

Risk / impact

  • Docs-only change; no product behavior or API contracts change.
  • Low reader-facing risk: the main nuance is that some API identifiers still include tokens, because they are public contract names. The surrounding prose now explains their current billing meaning.
  • No security or privacy-sensitive content added.

Testing

  • python3 ~/.factory/skills/apply-pr-standards/scripts/validate-pr-files.py
  • git diff --check
  • cd docs && fnm exec --using v22.22.0 npx -y mintlify@4.2.529 validate
  • cd docs && fnm exec --using v22.22.0 npx -y mintlify@4.2.529 broken-links --check-redirects

@mintlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mintlify Bot commented May 9, 2026

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
factory 🟢 Ready View Preview May 9, 2026, 12:43 AM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant