Conversation
it's a specific regression test for #62 which was added in #63. It ensures this fix to If I remember correctly there was an issue when EDIT: So I believe what it's doing is checking we get the same results when playing the match multiple times. |
(But it's very poorly documented: that's my bad.) |
|
I believe I've fixed the test, which passes locally. But all the tests won't work here until we release a new version of |
…th the Axelrod library
…tegy name is supplied, the object doesn't teardown correctly
add2510 to
c0b630f
Compare
|
Axelrod-Python/Axelrod#1288 has been merged: I plan to do a new release first thing tomorrow (Wednesday) morning. |
|
Looks good to me 👍 Once we have a new release I'll get the simulations going for the reproducing paper 👍 |
|
@meatballs PTAL. We should release a new version of axelrod-fortran after this PR goes in. The CI checks don't show up for me on this page, you can see them passing here. |
Could be worth moving this to GitHub actions? I could have a go at putting that together. |
|
Sorry I hit request review from you @drvinceknight and cannot rescind it |
Do not merge, won't work until the random_seed branch of Axelrod is merged
I don't understand whattest_champion_v_alternatoris doing.