Skip to content

Comment contract code #104

@0xernesto

Description

@0xernesto

It would be nice if the contract code was commented to make it easier to follow. Consider using NatSpec format. I understand most people will treat these contracts as a black box and trust the code because it's audited, but some of us want to understand the code before committing to using Kernel. Comments would save a lot of time when reviewing the code.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions