Java/C# Generic Arguments and Parameters Are Not Expressions

[jsipahio]

Currently generic arguments and parameters are expected to be expressions, like: <argument><expr><name>int</name></expr></argument>
However, in C# and Java they are marked up without the expression tag: <argument><name>int</name></argument>
There needs to be logic to handle if the argument/parameter is a name without being wrapped by an expression. Additionally, Java has <parameter_list type="generic"/> so that should be considered for generics.

[jsipahio]

Issue 41 branch assumes that Java markup will be fixed at some point to label class generic parameter lists with type="generic'.
The only outstanding issue is Java generic functions. The generic parameter list is in the type, but not a part of the name, as seen here: <T> void is marked up as <type><parameter_list type="generic"><parameter><name>T</name></parameter></parameter_list> <name>void</name></type>. This creates a conflict with the generic handler for the name.

[mjdecker]

From the srcML test suite, parameter list and argument lists have the type=generic. Anyway, thanks for identifying this. I will look into it and review the proposed solution

[mjdecker]

I am going to have to think how I want this handled a bit. There is code I can use, but the argument shouldn't be handling parameter data. I also don't think I want the generic data on the name element, but forwarded to the class/method.

[mjdecker]

I also will probably change this into two issues. 1 for arguments and 1 for generic parameters.