Skip to content

Restoration is fragile #29

@Hamms

Description

@Hamms

Three issues:

  1. There are a handful of ways for the restoration process to break, given bad inputs
  2. There are a handful of things we'd like to raise warnings about in the restoration (ie mismatching sets of redactions) and we do not currently have a good way to do so
  3. Restoration does not currently protect against the introduction of things that should be redacted in the modified redacted input

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions