Rename packet 82

[bartico6]

The name of packet [82] (https://github.com/Pryaxis/TerrariaAPI-Server/blob/28200f7d4447ee275e85856f97eee58fa156ffc4/TerrariaServerAPI/TerrariaApi.Server/PacketTypes.cs#L88) is misleading - it does not cause any netmodule to be loaded, as netmodules are loaded on server startup when NetManager.Initialize() is called.

It's an issue rather than PR as we should decide on which name will fit the most, as we'd like to avoid incidents like d8c7be1, da8fded and 28200f7 due to poor communication of the change.

I personally opt to rename it to simply NetModule, as that's exactly what it contains. It's a minor change, though.

[bartico6]

Any updates?

[hakusaro]

Don't know what a better name is than "LoadNetModule" and "NetModule" isn't a verb either.

[Ijwu]

Perhaps ReadNetModule? It just triggers a NetModule to be loaded from the stream.

[hakusaro]

ExecuteNetModule?

[QuiCM]

Perhaps ReadNetModule? It just triggers a NetModule to be loaded from the stream.

If that's the case, is LoadNetModule not accurate?

[QuiCM]

Our PacketTypes.cs naming contains a mix of Verb ActualPacketName and plain ActualPacketName
(e.g., Create CombatText, Complete AnglerQuest, etc.)
I don't really see any renaming that provides extra clarity (from the suggestions provided thus far)

[Ijwu]

I'm not entirely sure about renaming it either. I don't believe anything we change it to will actually provide extra clarity as to what the packet does. Since the packet and the logic behind it is quite complex there isn't really anything we can call it that makes it obvious and intuitive.

[hakusaro]

I don't know what the packet does.

[hakusaro]

& I've heard 10 different explanations for what it does.

[QuiCM]

Marking as stalled. This is still a bad packet that does multiple things with no common base

[AxeelAnder]

I suppose NetModule is terraria's next-gen network protocol, but they ended up with just two packets then back to the old one. I'd suggest to call it NetModule because it's different from others.